Unconfirmed Acts

The following are Acts that are missing either a full date and/or an Official source.

Displaying 675 – 700 of 742
1. Full Date of Act 1942
2. Name of Act (or Short Description) Prague
3. Geography of Act Czech Republic
4. Text of Act Commentary from other sources: 1) “Jews are excluded from receiving dried onions.” “Nazi Restrictions on the Jews of Prague & The Role of the Jewish Community Council,” Holocaust Education & Archive Research Team, Accessed 8/27/2015
5. Source None
6. Researcher None
7. Year of Research N/A
8. Notes None
1. Full Date of Act 1942
2. Name of Act (or Short Description) Decree issued by Nazi SS in occupied territory
3. Geography of Act Germany / Occupied Belgium
4. Text of Act Commentary from other sources: 1) “May 27 [1942] In occupied Belgium, German authorities issue a decree requiring all Jews to wear the yellow star.” “1942: Key Dates.” ushmm.org
5. Source None
6. Researcher None
7. Year of Research N/A
8. Notes None
1. Full Date of Act 1942
2. Name of Act (or Short Description) Law
3. Geography of Act Germany
4. Text of Act Commentary from other sources: 1) “Blind or deaf Jews no longer allowed to wear armbands identifying their condition in Traffic” “Learning: Voices of the Holocaust,” British Library website
5. Source None
6. Researcher None
7. Year of Research N/A
8. Notes None
1. Full Date of Act 1942
2. Name of Act (or Short Description) Prague
3. Geography of Act Czech Republic
4. Text of Act Commentary from other sources: 1) “The use of all types of public laundries by Jews is prohibited.”
“Nazi Restrictions on the Jews of Prague & The Role of the Jewish Community Council,” Holocaust Education & Archive Research Team, Accessed 8/27/2015
5. Source None
6. Researcher None
7. Year of Research N/A
8. Notes None
1. Full Date of Act 1942
2. Name of Act (or Short Description) Prague
3. Geography of Act Czech Republic
4. Text of Act Commentary from other sources: 1) “At peak periods, when the tramcar carriages are full, or when at tram stops more people queue than can be accommodated, the conductor is to tell the Jewish passengers to leave the carriage. Their tickets will cease to be valid” “Nazi Restrictions on the Jews of Prague & The Role of the Jewish Community Council,” Holocaust Education & Archive Research Team, Accessed 8/27/2015
5. Source None
6. Researcher None
7. Year of Research N/A
8. Notes None
1. Full Date of Act 1942
2. Name of Act (or Short Description) Prague
3. Geography of Act Czech Republic
4. Text of Act Commentary from other sources: 1) “Jews are excluded from the sale of dried fruit (raisins, prunes, hazelnuts and walnut kernels).”
“Nazi Restrictions on the Jews of Prague & The Role of the Jewish Community Council,” Holocaust Education & Archive Research Team, Accessed 8/27/2015
5. Source None
6. Researcher None
7. Year of Research N/A
8. Notes None
1. Full Date of Act 1942
2. Name of Act (or Short Description) “Jewish Dress Code”
3. Geography of Act Belgium
4. Text of Act Commentary from other sources: 1) “Jewish Belgians forced to wear the yellow badge.” “Yellow badge,” wikipedia.org
5. Source None
6. Researcher None
7. Year of Research N/A
8. Notes None
1. Full Date of Act 1942
2. Name of Act (or Short Description) Prague
3. Geography of Act Czech Republic
4. Text of Act Commentary from other sources: 1) “The sale of Czech newspapers to Jews, directly or indirectly, is prohibited.” “Nazi Restrictions on the Jews of Prague & The Role of the Jewish Community Council,” Holocaust Education & Archive Research Team, Accessed 8/27/2015
5. Source None
6. Researcher None
7. Year of Research N/A
8. Notes None
1. Full Date of Act 1942
2. Name of Act (or Short Description) Prague
3. Geography of Act Czech Republic
4. Text of Act Commentary from other sources:
1) “Jews are prohibited from crossing the park at the National Museum.”
“Nazi Restrictions on the Jews of Prague & The Role of the Jewish Community Council,” Holocaust Education & Archive Research Team, Accessed 8/27/2015
5. Source None
6. Researcher None
7. Year of Research N/A
8. Notes None
1. Full Date of Act 1942
2. Name of Act (or Short Description) “Jewish Dress Code”
3. Geography of Act Luxembourg
4. Text of Act Commentary from other sources: 1) “With the German annexation of Luxembourg, the yellow badge was introduced there.” “Yellow badge;” wikipedia.org
5. Source None
6. Researcher None
7. Year of Research N/A
8. Notes None
1. Full Date of Act 1942
2. Name of Act (or Short Description) Decree issued by Brigade Fuhrer Karl Oberg
3. Geography of Act Germany / Occupied France
4. Text of Act Commentary from other sources: 1) “With a long schedule of diplomatic exemptions, which included British and American subjects, Brigadefuhrer [Brigade Fuhrer] Karl Oberg published the Jewish badge decree for Occupied France on 1 June 1942. The badge had to be worn from the age of six upwards, and a clothing coupon had to be surrendered. The decree was received in a light-hearted manner initially and some young French men and girls wore the badge out of sympathy and in order to give the Security Police trouble.” Webb, Chris : “The Destruction of the Jews in France.” holocaustresearchproject.org
5. Source None
6. Researcher None
7. Year of Research N/A
8. Notes None
1. Full Date of Act 1942
2. Name of Act (or Short Description) Prague
3. Geography of Act Czech Republic
4. Text of Act Commentary from other sources: 1) “Jews wearing the yellow star are prohibited from using public telephones.”
“Nazi Restrictions on the Jews of Prague & The Role of the Jewish Community Council,” Holocaust Education & Archive Research Team, Accessed 8/27/2015
5. Source None
6. Researcher None
7. Year of Research N/A
8. Notes None
1. Full Date of Act 1942
2. Name of Act (or Short Description) Prague
3. Geography of Act Czech Republic
4. Text of Act Commentary from other sources:
1) “Jews are prohibited from entering Wenceslaus Sq. and approaches from Saturday 15:00 to Monday 8:00 hrs. Likewise the main railway station and approaches, likewise the approach roads leading to the Zoo.”
“Nazi Restrictions on the Jews of Prague & The Role of the Jewish Community Council,” Holocaust Education & Archive Research Team, Accessed 8/27/2015
5. Source None
6. Researcher None
7. Year of Research N/A
8. Notes None
1. Full Date of Act 1942
2. Name of Act (or Short Description) “Jewish Dress Code”
3. Geography of Act Bulgaria
4. Text of Act Commentary from other sources: 1) “Under German pressure, Bulgaria ordered its Jewish citizens to wear small yellow buttons, but contravention was not prosecuted.” “Yellow badge;” wikipedia.org
5. Source None
6. Researcher None
7. Year of Research N/A
8. Notes None
1. Full Date of Act 1942
2. Name of Act (or Short Description) Law issued by Bulgarian government
3. Geography of Act Germany / Occupied Bulgaria
4. Text of Act Commentary from other sources: 1) “In August 1942, the Bulgarian government established a Commissariat for Jewish Affairs with the objective of expelling the Jews of Bulgaria and confiscating their property. The ultimate aim of the commissariat, however, was not only for the Jews to finance the cost of implementing the Law for the Protection of the Nation but also to prepare them for shouldering the cost of deportation to the death camps in Poland.” “Bulgaria and the Holocaust.” holocaust.en-academic.com 2) “August 25, 1942…The establishment of a Commissariat for Jewish Affairs in Belgium along the same lines as in France and Rumania is demanded by the anti-Semitic and pro-Nazi Rexist Party in Brussels, Nazi-controlled Belgian newspapers reaching here today report. ‘Such an apparatus to deal with the Jews in Belgium is needed, because the Jews are endeavoring by all means to evade the existing anti-Jewish regulations and their activities, therefore, must be put under more stringent control,’ one of the Rexist papers writes. Other Belgian papers predict that the Nazi occupational authorities will soon announce measures in Belgium ordering the Jews to “productive work” which is interpreted here to mean that they will be sent to forced labor either in Belgian mines or in eastern territories occupied by the German army.” “Rexists Demand Establishment of Commissariat for Jewish Affairs in Belgium.” jta.org
5. Source None
6. Researcher None
7. Year of Research N/A
8. Notes None
1. Full Date of Act 1942
2. Name of Act (or Short Description) Prague
3. Geography of Act Czech Republic
4. Text of Act Commentary from other sources:
1) “Collections of Articles of Fur and of Woollens. Jews had to hand in all furs as well as woollens in their possession except where they had an absolute need of them.”
“Nazi Restrictions on the Jews of Prague & The Role of the Jewish Community Council.” Holocaust Education & Archive Research Team, Accessed 8/27/2015
5. Source None
6. Researcher None
7. Year of Research N/A
8. Notes None
1. Full Date of Act 1942
2. Name of Act (or Short Description) Prague
3. Geography of Act Czech Republic
4. Text of Act Commentary from other sources:
1) “Use of trains. In addition to previous orders Jews are not permitted to use porters, waiting rooms, refreshment stalls, etc.”
“Nazi Restrictions on the Jews of Prague & The Role of the Jewish Community Council,” Holocaust Education & Archive Research Team, Accessed 8/27/2015
5. Source None
6. Researcher None
7. Year of Research N/A
8. Notes None
1. Full Date of Act 1942
2. Name of Act (or Short Description) Decree issued by Italian Government
3. Geography of Act Italy
4. Text of Act Commentary from other sources:
1) “In the early months of the war, 43 concentration camps were set up in Italy for enemy aliens, and several thousand Jews of foreign nationality as well as about 200 Italian Jews were interned; however, conditions in the camps were, on the whole, bearable. In May 1942 the government decreed that all the Jewish internees would be mobilized into special work legions in place of military service. This order was only partially carried out, and the number of Jews actually mobilized did not exceed 2,000 men.”
“Encyclopaedia Judaica; Jews in Italy 04: Holocaust period 1938-1945.” Online article
5. Source None
6. Researcher None
7. Year of Research N/A
8. Notes None
1. Full Date of Act 1942
2. Name of Act (or Short Description) “Jewish Dress Code”
3. Geography of Act Germany / Occupied France
4. Text of Act Commentary from other sources: 1) “With the occupation of the French Zone libre Jews there were also forced to wear the yellow badge.” “Yellow badge;” wikipedia.org
5. Source None
6. Researcher None
7. Year of Research N/A
8. Notes None
1. Full Date of Act 1942
2. Name of Act (or Short Description) Prague
3. Geography of Act Czech Republic
4. Text of Act Commentary from other sources: 1) “Handing in of Furs by Slovak nationals. Articles of fur and of woollens owned by Jews of Slovak nationality had also to be delivered up.” “Nazi Restrictions on the Jews of Prague & The Role of the Jewish Community Council,” Holocaust Education & Archive Research Team, Accessed 8/27/2015
5. Source None
6. Researcher None
7. Year of Research N/A
8. Notes None
1. Full Date of Act 1942
2. Name of Act (or Short Description) Decree by the Reich Commissioner for the occupied territories of the Netherlands, Artur Seyss-Inquart
3. Geography of Act Germany / Occupied Netherlands
4. Text of Act Commentary from other sources:
1) “Following his assumption of office in the Netherlands on 29 May 1940, Seyss-Inquart, pursuant to the authority vested in him as Reich Commissar of the Netherlands by the Fuehrer decree of 18 May 1940, systematically promulgated decrees designed to implement the Nazi program of persecution and elimination of Jews…Other anti-Semitic decrees of a like nature, all of which were signed by Seyss-Inquart and published in the Verordnungsblatt fuer die besetzen niederlandischen Gebiete (VOBL) [Official Gazette for the occupied Dutch territories], may be summarized as follows: 3336-PS, Verordnungsblatt, No. 13, p.289, 23 May 1942. Compulsory written declaration by Jews of claims of any kind of which they are beneficiaries to be made at banking firm Lippman, Rosenthal & Co., Amsterdam. Titles and other documents proving the claims are to be delivered to the bank at the time of the declaration, all rights to such claims being vested in the above mentioned bank. The debtor can liberate himself only in the hands of the bank and by so doing is released. The declaration embodies also rights on property or chattels real, participations as in corporations and partnerships; reversions, expectancies. Collections of all kinds of art objects, art articles, articles of gold, platinum, silver, as well as polished or rough diamonds, semi-precious stones and pearls, belonging in part or in whole, legally or “economically” to a Jew, must be delivered to said bank, with exception of wedding rings and those of a deceased husband, silver watches, used table silver, provided that each person belonging to the family of the owner may keep only a cover consisting of 4 pieces, a knife, a fork, a spoon and a dessert spoon; teeth- fillings of precious metals.”
“Artur Seyss-Inquart.” jewishvirtuallibrary.org
5. Source None
6. Researcher None
7. Year of Research N/A
8. Notes None
1. Full Date of Act 1942
2. Name of Act (or Short Description) Prague
3. Geography of Act Czech Republic
4. Text of Act Commentary from other sources: 1) “Evacuation of Beneschau. 137 Jews were removed from Beneschau and resettled within a week in Tábor with Jewish families.”
“Nazi Restrictions on the Jews of Prague & The Role of the Jewish Community Council,” Holocaust Education & Archive Research Team, Accessed 8/27/2015
5. Source None
6. Researcher None
7. Year of Research N/A
8. Notes None
1. Full Date of Act 1942
2. Name of Act (or Short Description) Prague
3. Geography of Act Czech Republic
4. Text of Act Commentary from other sources: 1) “The sale of pork to Jews is prohibited.”
“Nazi Restrictions on the Jews of Prague & The Role of the Jewish Community Council,” Holocaust Education & Archive Research Team, Accessed 8/27/2015
5. Source None
6. Researcher None
7. Year of Research N/A
8. Notes None
1. Full Date of Act 1942
2. Name of Act (or Short Description) Decree by the Reich Commissioner for the occupied territories of the Netherlands, Artur Seyss-Inquart
3. Geography of Act Germany / Occupied Netherlands
4. Text of Act Commentary from other sources:
1) “Following his assumption of office in the Netherlands on 29 May 1940, Seyss-Inquart, pursuant to the authority vested in him as Reich Commissar of the Netherlands by the Fuehrer decree of 18 May 1940, systematically promulgated decrees designed to implement the Nazi program of persecution and elimination of Jews…Other anti-Semitic decrees of a like nature, all of which were signed by Seyss-Inquart and published in the Verordnungsblatt fuer die besetzen niederlandischen Gebiete (VOBL) [Official Gazette for the occupied Dutch territories], may be summarized as follows: 3325-PS, Verordnungsblatt, No. 11, p.211, 1 May 1942. Exclusion of Jews from the Dutch Arbeitsfront (N.A.F.)” “Artur Seyss-Inquart.” jewishvirtuallibrary.org
5. Source None
6. Researcher None
7. Year of Research N/A
8. Notes None
1. Full Date of Act 1942
2. Name of Act (or Short Description) Prague
3. Geography of Act Czech Republic
4. Text of Act Commentary from other sources:
1) “The closure of Jewish schools was decreed and every public as well as private tuition of Jewish children is forbidden.”
“Nazi Restrictions on the Jews of Prague & The Role of the Jewish Community Council,” Holocaust Education & Archive Research Team, Accessed 8/27/2015
5. Source None
6. Researcher None
7. Year of Research N/A
8. Notes None